Tuesday, April 10, 2018

The Five Points of Leftist Ideology-Part VI- Acceptance of The Absurd. Contortions of The Mind.


"If you can be convinced to believe in absurdities. You can be convinced to commit atrocities."
Christopher A.W. Maider

 

    As I mentioned in the opening of this series one of the things that kept Soviet Union society cohesive and peaceful was NOT the KGB, Secret Police or the Gulag. What kept the day-to-day life predictable and even keel was the ability of the citizenry to plug away each day knowing the lines would be long, bread would run out, gas rations never lasted the month, and the light was always broken on the street corner. It was an innate feeling that this is just how life is under Communism; that in time they would rise above, overtake those selfish Capitalist pigs and Communism would be the future of the world.

    It is the ability of the human animal to endure the unendurable in order to survive. It is why camps full of Jews in 1940 went to the chambers under a handful of armed guards. It is why truckloads of Christians were slaughtered by a handful of ISIS holding AK-47's. It is why tens of thousands of Venezuelans are held at bay by a couple dozen police with water cannons and tear gas. 
    It is the same reason why former Soviet citizens would stand in line for hours waiting for bread.

    If we revisit the Five Points we can close the loop at this point. One can enter this closed loop system at any point and all Five Points fall right into place exposing the Leftists.

    A Lack of Principle allows for a Cognitive Dissonance. This separation of reality and removal of foundational truths makes it easy for one to be Convinced of their Position on an issue regardless of how it may run counter to a related issue a Leftists may be for or against. This is Selective Outrage. (As I quoted in the last segment from Dr. RD Laing). 

    The employing of all these points demands a contortion of one's mind in order to make sense.

It requires an Acceptance of The Absurd.

     Not far from the town I grew up in there is a plaque i
n the Westborough Mass. District Court House that bears a decidedly Orwellian inscription. "Obedience to The Law is Liberty".      This is a constant reminder to the poor saps who have to stand before a Judge with no idea of their Constitutional Rights. George Orwell himself wrote in '1984' about the ability of the masses to carry on their assigned tasks, waiting in line, keeping quiet. Once and awhile being Selectively Outraged because one of them dared to rebel. 
     In the movie version Winston meets his neighbor in prison. He asks why his neighbor is there. The neighbor says his own son turned him in because he heard him uttering 'un-words' while in his sleep.        Though fictional, in this one scene all Five Points are employed at once culminating into the final Acceptance of The Absurd. Winston's neighbor is actually proud of his son for turning him in. 

    Today, our society is rife with oxymorons and contortions of the mind. The level is palpable to the point where 1 in 10 average persons are clinically, yet functionally insane. (Cornell U.). I wrote years ago about how between 2012 and 2014 the amount of school aged children nationwide on SSRI drugs reached 17%. (CDC). With this emerged a side affect of that epidemic. 
    The school shootings. 
    Yet, our societal-wide Cognitive Dissonance to the growth of mental illness in America ignited the Selective Outrage towards guns. The latest in school shootings has revealed a bizarre manifestation over 'white guilt'. Media and the FBI worked hard to hide the manifesto written by Audrey Hale. The focus (as always) was to remain on the guns.
    In other words, ignore the fact that people are fucked in the head and keep pushing the narrative that guns need to be banned.

    Audrey Hale accepted the absurd notion that white supremacy is a real thing. Hale also bought into the absurd notion that he can become a woman. People and the media are calling for the release of the manifesto. In an article by Kathy Fung of Newsweek there is pushback from the LGBT crowd.
 
    "Calls for police to release the "manifesto".... has prompted concern among LGBTQ+ groups, who caution against the publication of such a document."

    And I don't blame them! People already think this whole transgender thing is nuts. Imagine if society got a whiff of this document!
    

     Social Media has expanded upon this 1 in 10 concept. The billions of people who are logged in on the multitude of platforms can be narcissistic, antagonistic They can be trolls, angry feminists and more than willing to shut you down. The algorithms from these companies are set up to allow the antagonist while censoring the person who points it all out.

Insanity has gone viral.



    You can argue facts all you wish. It won't matter. There are too many people Convinced they are right in how they 'feel'. A perfect example is the Climate Change hysteria. Leftists have accepted the absurd notion that the world is going to end in a few years. Children have been brainwashed. The Green New Deal will pump billions into the energy sector, most of it to China and the environmental laws will become so restrictive that average Americans won't be able to travel. 
    Leftists think this is great! And the Elitists don't care about the damage it does. Rules for thee, not for me.

Banning gas stoves, except for them


    One of the best textbook examples of Acceptance of the Absurd was all the Trump Derangement Syndrome during that Administration.  It all started with a fake dossier (admitted so by the author) that became the basis of an investigation and impeachment.    This launched a nationwide, governmental witch hunt. Twenty months and $50 million later no evidence has surfaced. Then, the focus turned to a spurned porn star (we believe survivors-when it suits our needs). Sadly, the same people who were convinced of a failed Russian Collusion accusation were as convinced this porn star had all the answers. Every Congressional Hearing from witnesses where the media was convinced this was the smoking gun, none of this presented the evidence that President Trump was guilty of anything.
    The Acceptance of the Absurd has now entered the litigation phase to charge the President with meddling in the 2020 Election. Again, Leftists are sure (this time).
    None of this matters. An entire media industry and scores of Americans are sure that President Trump is guilty of.... Something.    And it fuels this societal-wide psychosis.

    It will have deep and lasting political ramifications our Republic won't recover from.
    As we always see. The Left thrives on crisis. A crisis (as Rahm Emmanuel once said) should never go to waste. There must always be some 'fear'. The Newspeak term is 'Existential threat'. In fact, it has become so commonplace with the Left that it is losing its ability to mean anything anymore. 
    People get tired of this crap after a while.



In the book, 'The Tea Party-Three Principles', Elizabeth Price Foley puts forth her premise:

1; Limited Government

2; Unapologetic American Sovereignty

3; Constitutional Originalism



     If you take these three 'principles' then all "feel-good" arguments lose merit. The entire Conviction of Position of beliefs and feelings hold no bearing on what is rooted in our Foundation. The entire Leftist mantra is lost in its own (as Jefferson said) "..foggy field.." Outside the preview of these principles. Outside the purview of our Constitution. 
     The Bible states clearly about a house built upon sand. That, as political winds shift that house cannot stand. However, a house built upon rock (principle) can weather any shifting sand (or, political wind).

    And it is where we find ourselves today. Always shifting. Always holding a wet finger to the wind to see which way we should go. Inside that 'foggy field' our foundation has become lost.

    Remember David Hogg? The 17 year old who became the poster boy for gun control. David Hogg was once considered the point person who had his finger on the pulse of America that demanded more gun legislation. 
    That is until Kyle Rittenhouse showed up.

    Would you take marriage advise from a 17 year old? Investment advise from a 17 year old? So, why was it we once put this kid up as the arbiter of the 2nd Amendment?
    Because we Accept the Absurd.

    Laura Ingraham was called a 'Nazi pig' for pointing out this charade. Rittenhouse was put on trial.

    Rush Limbaugh was sure that the Feminists would call out the Ingraham issue. How dare you call a woman a pig. 
    No, this didn't not fit the narrative. No Feminist came to her defense. As a bumper sticker once displayed, 'It's not that she is a woman, she is a Republican'.

     If you are proposing that you cannot own a weapon until 21 then why would we listen to a 17 year old on guns? On that same level, why then would you claim that a person is unable to own a gun, drink, rent a car until the age of 21 yet demand that the voting age be lowered to 16 (Guterriez/Braude)? 
    How do you square this round hole? 
    Leftists don't. Because they don't have to.

    Leftist Ideology demands reactionary-ism. It demands a constant manufacturing of anger, separatism, victim-hood, class warfare, a constant barrage of the 'have's' and the 'have-not's'.  Conservatism knows none of these bromides. Leftist Ideology must constantly indoctrinate the youth of America to supply a fresh generation of 'useful idiots'. A fresh generation of the disenfranchised.

    In one of many interviews I had with 2014 and 2018 Gubernatorial Candidate for Massachusetts Dr. Scott Lively spoke about this very subject.



    His thesis was simple; that God has set into motion certain laws and these laws are immovable. Our human interpretation of these laws has lead us from our Judeo-Christian roots to that which our nation is founded upon. These laws are also found in the Torah, 10 Commandments, many Buddhists texts, Hindu texts and our Constitution. What we are experiencing now is a complete repudiation of all we have known for over two millennia. It is as if all the laws of God (and science) are now up to interpretation.
    And more absurdly, the adulteration of those laws.
    If we are able to negate God we can negate our individualism. We negate our sovereignty. We can negate our principles. Everything becomes interpretative. It becomes how one 'feels'.
    We even adopt the idea that our self absorbed man-centric absurdity is what we believe.

     In a brilliant article written April 8th 2018 by Dr. Michael Hurd he opines with this perfect assessment of society today:


" Common sense used to be a great concept. Unfortunately, it has been co-opted and abused by irrational people. Today’s culture is FULL of irrationality and irrational people, more than ever before."
"What is common sense? It refers to the self-evident based upon the fairly easily provable. The way we use the phrase common sense today is not that way.


At its best, common sense is not a substitute for highly technical or specialized knowledge. It’s a way of coping with the limited knowledge most of us have in a highly specialized world. It’s a way of insisting we reason and think about both what we do know and do not know."

" People who say "common sense", in today’s context, often want to bypass the reasoning required to make their claim about something highly questionable, radical or untenable."

" Increasingly, common sense is a tactic of intimidation.... The purpose of such shaming is to arrest or obliterate dissension or discussion. It’s intellectual dishonesty or fraudulent elitism at its worst...The death of common sense was inevitable in a culture where reason has been slowly perishing for some time...."



     This lack of collective (common sense) understanding of our Constitution further erodes our collective (common sense) understanding of our system of government. 
    It has been ever thus as my mother would say. Franklin was correct when he remarked to the woman outside Independence Hall; ".. a Republic, if you can keep it.."




    In a stunning display of dysfunction, one of the characters from the Parkland shooting, Emma Gonzalez, openly admitted she bullied and taunted Nikolas Cruz for years. She is now one of the spokespeople for national disarmament. Her challenging of Dana Loesch was seen as brave, but it was the way her question was perfectly scripted to fit the narrative and how CNN posted the question on the screen. 
    Watch..



 
     It takes a contortion of the mind and a purposeful disregard of Common Sense that fractures normal thinking. Is it any wonder why mental illness is on the rise? Why so many people are prescribed psycho-active drugs by the millions?
    An entire media industry promotes, extols upon and insists that The Absurd is the paradigm. Any challenge to it is summarily singled out. There is no more rational behavior, let alone moral behavior. The FBI gets away with whatever it wants, The Elite gets away with whatever they want. Murder, rape, human trafficking, rigged elections.. The attempted take down of a Presidency...

"... And if that wasn't evil enough. We get the drunken and passionate pride of the citizen along for the ride..." Rush.

     We are so afraid to see the cage we are born into. We are so afraid to see the farm we are forced to work in. We Accept the Absurd because it keeps life steady, keeps life quiet. It is the reason why nothing ever gets done. Nothing gets solved. Diseases never cured. People still poor. Entire nations wrenched with war. Religion and Ideologies at each other's throats. Constantly, all of it always constantly..

    To lose your Principles you become Cognitively Disconnected as you Selectively Outrage, Convinced of your Position (however Impossible) until you find yourself one day Contorting your mind and....
    Accepting the Absurd.

To see the cage is to be free....





....And That Is The Diatribe....

Friday, March 2, 2018

The Five Points of Leftist Ideology. Part V.- Selective Outrage


    

    In the 1977 book, "Crusaders, Criminals, Crazies" Dr. Frederick Hacker writes this on Selective Outrage. How it is constructed and how it manifests. p.145.

    "..compulsory thought.. established internalizations are first dislodged of their anchorage.. by denunciation of the sources and content of the former introjected values... then persons and symbols are offered as recipients of that ..ego.. to act in lieu of and on behalf of that individual.."


    Essentially, the idea is that one is subjected to being pissed off about what is happening right now. None of it based on 'content' or 'principle', but rather, what is current and the crisis 'de-jour'. Always acting out. Never being pro-active aside from pro-acting upon one's 'acting out'. Subject to change (of course) as the political winds blow.

    Debates on gun control following any mass shooting is a prime example. Always reacting at the moment but never taking into account 'context' (as Dr. Hacker explained). Always 'dislodge' the anchor of our Constitution in lieu of a new outrage as it pertains to the crisis de-jour.


This is dysfunctional.

    In 1964 Dr. R.D. Laing wrote; " The social adaptation of a dysfunctional society may be dangerous.."


    We are at that point today where the entire dysfunction of our society is displayed on social media every single day. Leftists are outraged at whatever comes across the screen without warning. The goal post is always moving. One never knows what, or who you are offending at any given moment. 
 
    Could this be (possibly) a form of 'GroupThink'?

    Dr. Hacker goes on to say; " Full membership in the...group is granted only in.. Submitting to.. and induced to perform actions with and for the group.. he/she will be firmly welded into the unit because his/her internal demands for consistency will compel him/her to talk  and think as he has acted..."

    One must always be Selectively Outraged at that which one is programmed to be outraged by. Content, context means nothing. Current Convictions of Positions must apply, whatever the 'Group Think' narrative is at that moment. Cognitive Dissonance exists on this compulsion because there is a Lack of Principle. ER-go. You Accept The Absurd.

All Five Points of Leftist Ideology begin to come into play.

    Take BLM, Millennials, ANTIFA. None of what they say, or protest is based on principle or content or context. It is always 're-actionary'. Based solely on how outraged they are. They are compelled to talk and think as they act.

    Years ago, I had a great conversation with Dr. Scott Lively on my podcast about the ability of the Left to be who they are and act as they do. He explained how the Left accepts 'random-ness'; that everything is hap-hazard and (to them) there is no God, and everything just comes about as it does. This is why men can use a woman's bathroom or why abortion is perfectly acceptable because everything today is totally random. This is why the Left is able to act upon whatever happens NOW and project that into action for whatever cause they 'feel' is important at that moment.

    But, as Dr. Lively explained on my radio show, there is a natural order to things. There are 'principles' that have defined centuries of civilization. Regardless of your religious beliefs one must admit that there must be an order to things. There are certain behaviors of society. 
    If I might adopt a Socialist axiom here? Are we NOT (as a society) supposed to be working together for a greater good? The betterment of mankind?

    We are all Selectively Outraged. Conservatives as well. Angered at what we see and re-acting as such. Our mindset is based on what we are convinced of.

    Dr. Hacker, "... very difficult, yet very principled to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate aggression.."

    Dr. R.D Laing, " We begin with the children... catch them in time... thorough and rapid brainwashing.. we shall turn them into imbeciles.. with high IQ's.. if possible.."


    This way they may be all vapid (yet reactionary) at how Selectively Outraged they are tonight, tomorrow and the day after that. As Dr. Lively said about removing God and everything being random we lose our foundation. Human behavior becomes untempered.

G.K. Chesterson


    Dr. Paul Kenger Ph.D. quotes writer and philosopher G. K. Chesterson in the 2016 book '11 Principles of A Reagan Conservative' in describing where this leads people: p.88-90

    "...(into) a morbid weakness, sacrificing the normal for the abnormal."

    Chesterson might have been a Christian Apologist but if he were alive today I think he would be quick to point out a direct causality between the removal of morality and our current state of social affairs. In fact, abnormalcy is exactly what Leftists pander in. Just look at TicTok! It panders to the stupid, the narcissist, and the re-actionary. College students cannot find countries on a map but insist everything is racist and a product of white privilege and colonialism.

    And being outraged is the only recourse an ignorant mind has to deal with the Cognitive Dissonance going on in their heads. Going all in (doubling down) to cope with the obvious duality of thought. This is why people instantly flip the fuck out and riot. As Dr. Hacker states they think as they act and act as they think. The recent response to the attacks in Israel has brought out the worst in human ignorance. Violent protests on behalf of a murderous Leftist regime known as Hamas. The upside down-front to back idea that a violent terrorist group is the victim here is symptomatic of the Five Points of Leftist Ideology. 
    The funniest part is how the LGBT-I, You, He, She It, We, They group has come out in support of a people and culture that openly murders them. (see Cognitive Dissonance).

    But it is easy for Leftists to do this. They are a blood cult. They worship the death of the unborn. Margaret Sanger is their matriarch. The Selective Outrage poured out after the SCOTUS reversal of Roe v Wade. The focus was on them, their bodies, their rights. Not one mention of the helpless body growing inside. As a reaction, some Democrat controlled legislatures passed bills allowing unrestricted access to abortion right up to the moment of birth.
    It would be worthy to note that this same ideology that preached "My body, my choice." is the same ideology that pushed heavily for mandated vaccinations. (again, see Cognitive Dissonance).

    The #metoo movement is another great example of Selective Outrage. Hollywood stars came out of the woodwork relating some lurid tale of inappropriate sexual tryst they suffered to get a role in a movie. I remember when the first female reporters were allowed in men's sports locker rooms then complained about the guys walking around naked. The 90's were full of lawsuits over male only gyms. But not one case over female only gyms.
    I will never forget the look on Bill Clinton's face when Trump invited all the women involved with Clinton to the second debate in 2016. Women's groups were losing it. The cackling hens on The View were experiencing the vapors over it. Judge Kavanaugh's accuser Blasey Ford couldn't recall the date, time or place and none of the women she claimed who witnessed the assault knew what the hell she was talking about. But the investigation went on, Vagina hats and Feminazis pounded on the doors of the Supreme Court shouting "We believe survivors!"


        This Selective Outrage is media guided. Not driven agenda-wise as some would claim but carefully guided along to ensure the correct information is fed to perpetuate the ideology. People jump on the bandwagon of an issue without really researching the issue or taking into account the other side. Misrepresenting issues, events, even people gets stuck in the heads of the public. The mob mentality follows and forming an angry mob becomes second nature regardless of the fact that few in the crowd even understand why they are there in the first place.


....And That Is The Diatribe....

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

The Five Points of Leftist Ideology. Part IV- Conviction of Position/The Impossible




 

     

    George Barnes wrote an interesting piece in the Telegram and Gazette on Jan 27th. 2018 on welcoming the world to our melting pot. He opines on the altruism of unfettered immigration to our country. He employs the commonly used Conviction of Position that the United States is "..a nation of immigrants.." This is an utter falsehood.

    First of all, we are a Sovereign nation. As far as our history of immigration is concerned we are NOW the descendants of immigrants. Actual documented and adjudicated 'immigrants' who take the Oath and join as Citizens number only a few hundred thousand a year. This hardly qualifies in a country of 350 million (or so) as a nation of immigrants.

    So, what we are?
    What we are is a Sovereign nation with a serious border control issue!
    This is the reality; but Leftists are convinced of their position, outraged at the idea of any discussion on this issue and accepting the absurdity that we actually ARE a nation of immigrants.


Dictionary.com defines 'Conviction' as;
noun.

1. a fixed or firm belief:

4. the act of convincing a person by argument or evidence.

5. the state of being convinced.

I left out definitions 2-3 because it dealt with criminal convictions.

Bing.com does it one better.

a firmly held belief or opinion:
synonyms: belief · opinion · view · thought · persuasion · idea · position · stance ·
the quality of showing that one is firmly convinced of what one believes or says:
synonyms: certainty · certitude · assurance · confidence · sureness ·



   
Notice none of these definitions have anything to do with facts. Re-read the definitions. Words such as, belief, persuasion, position, stance. Even the Dictionary.com definition uses the term "a state of.."
    The ability to convince someone of something is a lot easier than you would think. All it takes is a day to day, slow, methodical inserting of words and phrases over a period of time and soon it becomes a social lexicon.
    The use of the term 'American Democracy' is now rooted in our lexicon. 
    We are not a Democracy.
    Every time we have a heat wave, hurricane, blizzard it is now the absurdly accepted Conviction of Position that it is all because of Anthropogenic Climate Change. 
    It is simply weather.

    These are just small examples. Just perk up your ears and listen to the way people and pundits maximize the use of such phrases. It matters not the presenting of alternative facts. Conservatives are always held to facts. Leftists have the finger on the emotional pulse of society.
     Leftists want to segregate and define our individualism. It is the only way to steal that last vestige of our intrinsic and birthright as Americans.
     By accepting the absurd that we are a 'nation of immigrants'  Leftists can further define us and label us as separate. African -American, Asian -American, Muslim-American. This divides us and allows for multi-culturalism instead of assimilation.

    So, how is it Leftists are so easily convinced of their positions?     

    Pete Townsend of The Who once wrote; ".. cuz ya know that the hyptnotized never lie.. Do-Ya!"

    It comes from indoctrination. It comes from years of the same metaphors, worn out songs on the Hit Station! Teachers using textbooks written by Howard Zinn revisionists. Eventually we get masses of millions completely devoid of critical thinking and easy, empty vassals (not vessels). And they all just agree on the Absurdly Accepted mantra.
    Mark Dice does great video expose's where Liberals pontificate on positions they know nothing about. They do so because they are taught to regurgitate predetermined answers to everything and anything. Ami Horowitz did the video blowing the lid off the myth of voter ID being racist. Here is the link;





     The sad part is the soft bigotry of lowered expectations. The white Leftists are convinced of their positions on Voter ID being racist. The Cognitive Dissonance surfaces when presented with evidence of other nations using Voter ID.
    Convictions are difficult to alter. There are entire safeguards in place to reinforce these convictions in the minds of people. Television plays an important role and is an important tool. What we see and hear is carefully choreographed to fit a narrative, promote that narrative, even justify it's existence. The talking heads of most major networks are the mouthpieces of an editorial board that hands them the talking points. This, in turn, is read from the teleprompter to an eager audience. The advent of internet media and alternative news sources would make one think that the likes of CNN or MSNBC would alter their tactic or risk losing more of their audience share.   

    But no! Instead, they double down on the narrative. This is purposeful.



Tactically this is Ingenius. Reinforce a narrative to a specific audience receptive to said narrative. An audience convinced of their position and unlikely to be swayed from that conviction.

    Unfortunately, conviction of position stymies growth. Having a set idea of something that is unwavering shuts out the ability to see and understand a position that differs from your own. This is separate from a 'principle' because a principle is based on a foundational truth.   
   This is why the 'tolerant' Left tends to become very intolerant when faced with opposing viewpoints. The rioting at Berkely over Milo Yanopolous, the recent ANTIFA crowds at the two Boston Free Speech Rallies, the shouting down of speakers at college events. There is no lack of examples. 

   More of the lexicons used to reinforce the conviction of position are the 'phobics'. Homophobic, xenophobic, transphobic. Every description under the sun to showcase an imagined unreasonable fear of one group or another. 

When the principle that children should not be exposed to homosexuality the term homophobic is thrown at you. When the principle that no matter how many body parts you alter you cannot change the X or Y chromosome is presented the term transphobic is thrown at you. It is all well and good that a person feels this way or, believes these things it is just a position that is being taken and has no impact upon the facts presented or the fact that these facts don't care how one feels.

      Finally, one last thing that is hardly mentioned anymore is the old adage that one person's rights end where another person's rights begin. 
          The conviction of position throws this out. 

     Positions become lexicon and therefore any one who disagrees with lexicon must have something wrong with them. 

I am convinced of it.
 
.... And That Is The Diatribe....

Saturday, January 13, 2018

The Five Points of Leftist Ideology. Part III - Cognitive Dissonance



 



Wikipedia defines Cognitive Dissonance as; In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. The occurrence of cognitive dissonance is a consequence of a person performing an action that contradicts personal beliefs, ideals, and values; and also occurs when confronted with new information that contradicts said beliefs, ideals, and values.[1][2]

    The actual mental disorder is supposed to be discomforting. 
    A cognitive person would recognize this and seek to avoid it or at least recognize it and dismiss one of the two opposing thoughts as false. 
    This is what normal people do.
    Not Leftists. Leftist Ideology demands that you hold fast to both contradictory thoughts at the same time while defending both of them at the same time.

Wikipedia goes on to state; In A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957), Leon Festinger proposed that human beings strive for internal psychological consistency in order to mentally function in the real world. A person who experiences internal inconsistency tends to become psychologically uncomfortable and is motivated to reduce the cognitive dissonance. This is done by changing parts of the cognition to justify the stressful behavior, by adding new parts to the cognition that causes the psychological dissonance, or by actively avoiding social situations and contradictory information that are likely to increase the magnitude of the cognitive dissonance.[1]



    In the first part Festinger posits that normal people seek an equilibrium. Find the fact and disregard the absurd. 
    The mental (and physical) discomfort experienced by some one who is cognitively dissonant will justify the psychosis. In many cases we have seen over the past decade Leftists resort to name calling, violence and a demand that the opposing thought (that counters or corrects the dissonance) be silenced. 
    Vagina Hats dress up as vaginas, gays march half dressed waving dildos at parades, actresses wear revealing dresses at Golden Globes while they decry sexual abuse via the #metoo movement. There are dozens of genders despite the fact male and female are the scientific norm. But we must believe in "The Science".  Trump (a tv celebrity billionaire with no political experience) is not qualified to be President. Oprah Winfrey (a tv celebrity billionaire with no political experience) was once pushed to be the 2020 Democrat Candidate. 
    The upside down backwards is forwards mentality of the Left requires one to carry a scorecard to keep track of the ever changing fluidity that is axiomatic of that ideology..

    Let's revisit the 11 Commandments of Lie-Awatha Warren (talk about the personification of Cognitive Dissonance). This little gem is a treasure trove of CD.

"We believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher enforcement.."

    For what? 
    There are already library cart loads of fine print 3" binders full of SEC rules and regulations. Is she implying that there are NO rules presently? Remember what I said in the last piece about politicians who want ".. to do more.."? The fact that she opens this sentence with '..we believe..' is axiomatic of a Leftist's position based rather than a principle based doctrine.
     And what is cognitively dissonant about her statement is the fact that she has made millions off of insider trading. Another wonderful soundbite from her is her stance on out of control college tuition yet she was perfectly happy to teach ONE class at $300.000.

"We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth."


     It is bad enough (if we accept the absurd that humans are destroying the planet) with two genders consuming limited resources. Now there are 63 that require we cater to each and every one of their demands. We need to rewrite textbooks, hang new bathroom signs, designate parking spaces, create new forms for applications, clothing, food needs, locker rooms and educational services.. The list is endless. The carbon footprint must be astronomical! But this is necessary to be a more tolerant and diverse society.

    Science is never settled. The entirety of human history is rife with 'settled' science being debunked based on new discoveries. Interestingly, many of these new discoveries have come from accidents, catastrophes, and people who have more balls than brains pushing boundaries. 
    At the turn of the 20th Century many of the early, failed experimenters of flight were published in articles of reputable periodicals that human flight was impossible. The public absorbed this and believed that the science was settled. Fortunately for us all two brothers who built motorcycles had a different idea. 

"We believe that the Internet shouldn't be rigged to benefit big corporations, and that means real net neutrality."

    Here we see Warren claiming that free market Capitalism should be replaced by the all knowing, all seeing eye of benevolent Government. 
Corporations bad.
Government good. 
Unfortunately, Senator Warren is forgetting one tiny fact. Government is ALSO a corporation.

    While simultaneously claiming corporations are not people Warren wants to tax them to the fullest extent and then deny them access to representation.
     Net Neutrality is based on a 1934 law regulating communications under a Public Utility. It has no application on a 21st Century market that has exploded around the world. The repeal of The Fairness Doctrine under President Reagan unleashed the cable TV industry, internet and talk radio. Under the Warren idea (while claiming we are an 'equal' society) Net Neutrality would restrict or ban the plethora of diverse voices we now see on the World Wide Web. Even those we would disagree with or find most abhorrent. 
    Net Neutrality runs counter to The First Amendment.

"We believe that no one should work full-time and still live in poverty, and that means raising the minimum wage."

    Under economically bad conditions the cry for minimum wage increases becomes the news de-jour. Under economically good conditions the natural rise of wages is and economic benefit and no one seems to remember the gnashing of teeth over cheap wages. The need for workers becomes a demand. Companies are willing to pay more for qualified people. While this natural rise will lead to price increases the old adage of 'a rising tide' applies here. 
    The Laffer Curve is a principle. It is based on a fundamental truth. More people working means higher wages, means higher prices, means more growth demanding more high paid workers.


    Again, pointing to research and past blogs I have written; forcing an artificial raise in wages does not eliminate poverty (a fact). It only pushes that low skilled, low paid worker into a higher tax bracket (a position). The imagined raise in pay is taxed at that higher rate. Subsequently the prices of essentials rises also (to pay for that wage increase) and the low paid worker is no better off. What brings about a full and extensive economic rise for people is the unfettered growth of Capitalism and a standard of taxation that is representative, fair and equal. This is also a principle.




    Cognitive Dissonance is ever present in our news feeds today. Almost each day one story contradicts a story from last week while at the same time holding onto both stories to explain whatever the hell it is the corporate media is presenting to us. 
    It matters NOT what facts are presented. Agenda is the main driver. 
    It is point # 3, Conviction of Position, that is the main driver of Cognitive Dissonance.

    President Trump once called certain countries 'shitholes'. A normal person would agree. 
    They are shitholes! Because a normal person connects to accept this fact while disposing of the absurd. Leftists do not. Both thoughts exist at the same time. These countries are NOT shitholes despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And the idea of it is racist. 
    Many of these 'immigrants' have no intention of assimilating and any demand they do so is (in and of itself) racist. It is not like we are importing the next Einstein or Fermie or DeSousa. Somehow America must change while these countries do not have to change. In fact, the entire concept of 'Sanctuary Cities' does not just apply to Illegals. It applies to any group of people. Come to our cities to escape your shithole country and we will work to accept, assuage, adopt your culture thus turning our city into the very shithole you emigrated from. The adoption of Sharia Law in many communities to appear more diverse. English as a 'second' language (God forbid it should be first), no-go zones. Islamburg in upstate NY and Dearbornistan in Michigan. Kate Steinly murder in California. Islamic rape gangs in Oslo, Cologne, Paris and Nice.
    And as we have recently discovered, the massive influx of 'immigrants' to these virtue signaling cities of sanctuary are now inundated with social service systems breaking down. Mayors and a few Governors have requested help from the Federal Government..
    .. Wait a minute....
     I thought there was no such thing as an 'illegal'? I thought you were a 'Sanctuary City"?

    Even when the Cognitive Dissonance hits you square in the face the Leftist still continues down that path,
    Remember the definition from earlier:
 
.....by adding new parts to the cognition that causes the psychological dissonance, or by actively avoiding social situations and contradictory information that are likely to increase the magnitude of the cognitive dissonance.[1]


    It is here all Five Points come into play. It is a closed loop system.

    Any attempt to point this out runs counter to the;
 Acceptance of The Absurd. 
 It Compartmentalizes the Outrage,
 Leftists are Convinced of their Position. 
 It is Cognitively Dissonant.
 And none of it is based on any Principle.

 
.... And That Is The Diatribe....

 
According to cognitive dissonance theory, there is a tendency for individuals to seek consistency among their cognitions (i.e., beliefs, opinions). When there is an inconsistency between attitudes or behaviors (dissonance), something must change to eliminate the dissonance.

For more on Cognitive Dissonance and Leon Festinger,
https://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html

Friday, January 12, 2018

The Five Points of Leftist Ideology - Part II- Lack of Principles




 
A quick Google Search defines Principle as:

A fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning... a rule or belief governing one's personal behavior... morally correct behavior and attitudes...

(late Middle English: from Old French, from Latin principium ‘source,’ principia (plural) ‘foundations,’ from princeps, princip- ‘first, chief.’)

 
    The foundational principles this nation was based on are Judeo-Christian. These principles have been repeated for as long as I can remember. Mention that to any modern day millennial and they will have an aneurism. And because we have lost the 'principle' of a well balanced education our young people are quick to claim their 'position' on an issue as a 'principle'. 
    The two are unrelated.

    Positions can change according to new data (or at least they should). Principles are unwavering. They only change if a monumental, colossal shift occurs, either in one's personal life or society writ large. 
    Both Principle and Position are nouns, so they are things, tangible and usable. As stated, a principle is foundational, fundamental.    
    A Position (if you do that same Google Search) is defined as more of a strategic place to be. However, as the definitions are spelled out and defined we can see how position and principle are confused as one and the same: 

...a person's particular point of view or attitude toward something.... (Logic) a proposition laid down or asserted; a tenet or assertion... synonyms: viewpoint, opinion, outlook, attitude, stand, standpoint, stance, perspective, approach, slant, thinking, policy, feelings.. "the government's position on the matter".

    It is that last synonym that sums it all up. Feelings. 
    Listen closely when some one tries to define their 'position' on something. They always ".. feel as if...", or ".. I feel that it was unfair..." 
    Feelings have no place when it comes to principles. Facts couldn't give a rat's ass about how you feel.
    Our Declaration of Independence opens with these words, ".. We hold these truths to be self evident.." The Founders didn't 'feel' these 'positions' as self evident. That would have been an impossibility. Feelings and positions are by no stretch of the imagination self evident. Principles are!

    Issac Newton's Laws of motion were not based on how he felt. They were based on exhaustive inquiry, testing and a realization that there were certain things a person cannot change no matter how they felt about it.

Sir Isaac Newton first presented his three laws of motion in the "Principia Mathematica Philosophiae Naturalis" in 1686.


His first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force.
The second law explains how the velocity of an object changes when it is subjected to an external force. The law defines a force to be equal to change in momentum (mass times velocity) per change in time.

The third law states that for every action (force) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    Since Leftism requires one to not have any principles then the first law does not apply to them. No matter how hard one tries Leftists cannot be moved from their positions. Nor does the second law apply. Leftists never change their zeal, tactics or penchant for subterfuge to gain power. 
    Possibly the only law that applies to Leftists is the third one.       Usually when a person offers an opposing viewpoint or fact the Leftist inevitably loses their minds.

    The abortion debate is a perfect area to define by example what a principle is. People are always asked what their position is on abortion. 
    I have NO position. My principle is that the Government should not be involved in people's private lives. Nor should you or I.
    If Government held steady to that 'principle' then the debate over taxpayer funded abortion would evaporate. And if it is your 'position' that women should be allowed access to abortions then YOU pay for it!  Compete in the open market. If the idea of Planned Parenthood is so fantastic then why can it not stand on it's own principle?
    Because the killing of an unborn child is not a principle, it is a position.

    Most government agencies, programs, entitlements are not principle based. They are there to provide assistance in regards to an ongoing societal problem such as poverty. In fact the vast majority of social programs are rooted in the position of managing poverty. Certainly not to eliminate poverty. If that were the goal of these agencies then after awhile that agency would cease to exist because the principle would be to eliminate poverty. Once the job is finished, pack up shop!
   Welfare in general would no longer have a leg stand on. Agencies are never working towards a principle based goal. It is always a 'position' based on manageable data.

    Author and economist Loren Spivak (euphemistically known as The Free Market Warrior) has spoken eloquently on the concept of Leftists having no principles.  The first one is Free Speech. Under no uncertain terms is anyone to be denied the right to speak, publish, report or assemble to speak what they hold as a principle or a position. Leftists think decidedly differently on this subject. They have no problem employing the thug tactics of ANTIFA to shut down any group they deem offensive especially on college campuses where the Liberal Free Speech protests of the 1960's began. That is because ( as Spivak says at the 5:10 mark) ".. Liberals have no principles at all because they are a movement of power..."

 In the video below Spivak outlines a few more principles that are held sacred by Conservatives.



   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUlcbGijDTE&list=PLU_Z4p-v1UQZZVdA3KEseIx4en1nBv6Lv&index=1&t=526s


    If you google "The 11 Commandments of Progressivism" you will see the tenets espoused by Leftist Elizabeth Warren. The humorous part of all this is that none of them are principles. They are just feelings about various issues. The most interesting one being #11; 

"And we believe that corporations are not people, that women have a right to their bodies. We will overturn Hobby Lobby and we will fight for it. We will fight for it!"

    That cannot be a principle because it is an oxymoron and none of what Warren states is even related. If corporations are not people then why do we tax them? And what do women's bodies have to do with Hobby Lobby? The other ten are just as all over the map as this one is. 
    You see, a principle is simple, usually a single sentence. If you go through the Warren list every "principle" contradicts itself. She claims "..equal means equal.." but is going to deny Hobby Lobby equal representation and treat them as unequal simply because the executives hold an opposing opinion than hers. She claims to believe in science but will equally disregard any scientist who questions the  Climate Alarmism narrative.






    Like the useful idiots of the Communist Revolution once a person is no longer of use to the Party they are discarded. Just as a position is discarded in favor a new one, especially one that gets you elected.
    Leftists are always holding up a wet finger to the political wind to determine what position they should take on the current issue.

    A common saying of the Left is; "Speak truth to power". This is a dubious statement. Unfortunately it is used ad-nauseum. It is substance-less. It basically states that whatever it is YOU believe should be the truth. It claims that whatever your position is on an issue should be empowered. Not the facts of an issue but, your position on that issue.

    Speaking with the power of truth is principle based.
    Truth (in and of itself) is very powerful. There is no way around it. It simply just is. 
    If Leftists accepted this simple axiom their entire agenda would be in jeopardy. You can take any Leftist position, apply truth to it and the entire argument dissolves. This simply cannot be allowed because speaking truth to power allows flexibility. It allows you to hold two diametrically opposed thoughts in your head at the same time while accepting both of them as true. This is psychotic.

    Principles are unwavering. They are based on fundamental truths. They do not oppose one another and require no mental gymnastics to justify.

.... And That Is The Diatribe....

Friday, December 29, 2017

Five Points Of Leftist Ideology - Part I

" Find me the man and I will find you the crime." 
Joseph Stalin

" At the intersection of stupidity and certainty you will find the traffic accident better known as the College Leftist."
Christopher A.W. Maider




       

    It has taken me a number of years but I think I can finally understand the intricate workings of the Leftist mind. 

Remember.. I was raised to be one.


    It is a dangerous place to be. It really is a form of psychosis!
    It varies in intensity from individual to individual. Some are very mild, you would never know it. They function as fully cognitive citizens of society. Hell, you work with them! They are that brother, aunt, in law, that guy next door.
    Others are radical and violent. 
    However, they all share a set of rationalizations that are common throughout. There are Five Points. 

    These are the bullet points I will cover in detail as this revised and updated blog series continues.




 
1; Acceptance of the Absurd and Committing Atrocities.
 

    In the former Soviet Union one of the things that kept Communism firmly entrenched was not the powerful police state but the acceptance of the population that this is what life is like under Communism. People would make up excuses, rationalize why there were shortages and blame agitators. Even today a large segment of Russian society still longs for a return to Communism. 
    American Leftists see nothing wrong in the current state of affairs where freedom is concerned.  The dual Justice system is rationalized. The killing of unborn children while demanding Human Rights are both oxymoronic examples of the duality mindset Leftists possess. 
    The Left prostrates upon the alter of The Absurd. This why it is easy for them to commit atrocities.


2; Selective Outrage or Compartmentalization.

    It is easy for a Leftist to be outraged at the slightest thing yet are masters at separating like reasons to be outraged about because that particular thing runs counter to the Leftist narrative. 
    This is a form of schizophrenia.
    The ability to hold two diametrically opposed thoughts in one's head and firmly believe both diametrically opposed thoughts are true.
    A simple example is the "my body, my choice" narrative. Yet Leftists will make decisions for other's bodies for the collective well being and compartmentalize both thoughts as separate.
    This includes abortion and gender mutilation.


3; Conviction to the I
mpossible.

    To a Leftist, conviction of position requires no evidence to back up that position. If enough people are talking about it then it must be true especially if it is packaged into a trendy catchphrase or repeated multiple times over several media outlets. 
    The War on Women, Reproductive Rights, Gender Equality, Global Warming are all perfect examples of how something with no substance can become a complex social issue. If asked not one Lefty can easily define many of the positions held by Leftists. I have posted many Reels and Tic-Toc of interviews on FB with Leftists who have ZERO idea of what they are talking about or why they are there at the current protest.
    Therefore it becomes impossible to gain any tangible explanation of these impossible positions. Because they defy the physics of cogent rationalization and simple...Thought!


4; Denial of Reality or Cognitive Dissonance.

    In the face of overwhelming facts and opposing opinions a Leftist is literally unable to change their thinking and is predisposed to deny the existence of any alternate fact or reality. Leftists become hostile and will issue threats, doxxing or label you in the public square.
    These are tactics spelled out by Saul Alinsky.
    It is truly a chilling and frightening thing to experience.
    Yuri Besmenov spoke extensively about this "demoralization". The ability to set aside what one intrinsically knows is moral and correct and cognitively detach one's self from it.


5; Lack of Principle.

   Simple things like love of country, American values, family, God and Constitution are 'principled' institutions. Leftism seeks to defy, question and replace anything that represents our heritage as Americans. It is (in fact) Cultural Marxism.
    Leftists remove statues. Leftists replace education with indoctrination. Leftist have no problem looting and burning and calling it a "peaceful protest". It is easy for them to equate and gloss over their actions with their message regardless of the perception. 
    Quite literally lying to themselves. Yet, believing it at the same time.
    Not that they are practicing a principled right of Free Speech but rather Leftists seek to destroy and replace Free Speech with a position based agenda. 
    Leftists have all sorts of 'positions' on issues and they all fall within the acceptance of the absurd narrative.

 

    I will explain in subsequent blog posts how these five points interrelate. How employing one of these five points is backed by the other four and/or (in many cases) all five points are employed. It is almost like a closed loop system impervious to outside intervention and impossible to break. In fact, you can interact with any Leftist who displays just one of these five points and the observer can instantly apply the other four and the observer will not be wrong in his/her observation and ultimate understanding of just who the fuck they are dealing with.

    Lets look at an example that encompassed all of the above; 
    
    The Russian Collusion Delusion.

    I am not sure if there has been any other time in American History when an entire nation was duped by such a lie. The only thing I can think of is Orsen Welles' radio broadcast of an alien invasion. Despite the obvious evidence that no aliens had landed people were in a panic. 
    The same ws true for this investigation.

    James Clapper spoke on Meet The Press and openly stated that the Fusion/Steele Dossier was the impetuous that triggered the investigation. Yet, the dossier was proven false by the admission of the person (Christopher Steele) who wrote it. 
    Here's where it got screwy!
    Fusion GPS wrote another false dossier to be used in the (possible) impeachment of President Trump. Steele phone called the FBI to tell them he sold the dossier to the Clinton Campaign (who paid for it) and CNN and maybe they should investigate those two in the hopes to stave off his own arrest.
    But nope!
    The FBI hired Steele to come up with more fake dirt on Trump.

    The Alabama Senatorial Election is another prime example. Despite there being no evidence against Judge Roy Moore, despite the fact that testimony from two of the women was proven false Moore lost that election. Oddly, he lost it by such a narrow margin that there should be an investigation of voter fraud. The DNC openly admitted to bussing in people from out of state. 
    However, as I stated in a past blog post the fraudulently won seat usually stays in the hands of the fraudulent candidate.




 





 

    This example highlights every single one of the bullet points listed above. Democrats are firmly convinced this is the nature of politics and there is nothing any one can do about it. They accept the absurd. Democrats are outraged at the thought of our Presidential Election being rigged but have no problem bussing in people from out of state or stuffing ballots as was proven in the 2020 Presidential Election. 
     Regardless of the evidence there will be no investigation and election fraud will continue. 
    Democrats are firmly convinced this is perfectly fine. 
    Saul Alinsky said in his book Rules for Radicals, "... by any means possible.." 
    Conviction of position.
    Finally, Democrats are perfectly fine with the cognitive dissonance needed to get away with such tactics and are in complete denial of all evidence to the contrary because in order to mastermind and undertake such a scheme is to have no principles at all. The admission that these women were paid to slander Moore, then disappeared after the election is all the proof you need that this was orchestrated. And the public swallowed it, hook, line and sinker.

    And while we are on the subject of nefarious women: Why were the prostitutes who were supposedly paid by Trump to pee on a bed never brought before a sub committee?

    The mental schizophrenia can be entertaining at times. And it is here we introduce 

The Oxymoronism of Leftism.

    A few years back a good friend of mine was engaged in a debate over the construction of a new train station in Somerville Mass. It was going to cost billions, was not needed but scores of Beacon Hill acolytes were all in favor of it because of the name recognition and the fact that they now had a perfectly valid reason to hike up passenger rates. 
    As if that ever stopped them before.
     Finally my friend turns to his counterpart and says, ".. Well, I am glad that at least you admit Global Warming is a farce'" Stunned, the person comes back with his affirmation that Global Warming is real, the seas are rising and man is the sole cause of it, this is why we need more mass-transit. 
    My friend cooly responded with, ".. Then how can you justify spending billions on a train station that will be under water in 12 years?"

    The ability to hold two diametrically opposed thoughts in one's head while firmly convinced both diametrically opposed thoughts are true.

    That one statement has had me thinking about something related to this issue of Global.. er.. Climate Change. Considering many cities are located along coastlines in primarily Democrat held states why haven't those Democrat controlled states begun preparing for this inevitable doomsday? Why are sea walls not under construction? Have we begun to encourage citizens to move out to higher ground?
    No!
    There seems to be lots of money spent on 'infrastructure'. Why? If Climate Change is such an existential threat and sea levels will flood out major coastal cities; why do we spend tax payer money on highway projects in Boston, New York, DC? Why such a push to install wind turbines offshore to power these sunken cities?
    None of it makes any sense.

    In addition: I have always wondered how is it we are still destroying the environment? Did we not pass sweeping legislation in the 70's requiring emission controls on cars, factories and homes? The Clean Air and Water Act date back to the 60's along with the EPA. Haven't they cracked down on polluters? Haven't they made the regulations more restrictive each year? 
    What are you telling me here?
    That it was all a lie? That none of it worked anyway?

    The truth is, yes and no. It WAS a lie... And it worked.

    But a Leftist always has their little red cookbook to answer questions like these.
    'We need to do more'. 
    Be careful when any politician from any party talks about 'doing more'. That usually means they will be picking your pocket soon and taking more of your Liberty away. 
   



[I]n the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
— Socialist Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf



 
    It is easy for an entire Party to go so far as to convince an entire ideologically mesmerized mass of people to believe the Big Lie no matter what that lie entails. A person who supports Clinton, Sanders will support a Liz Warren, John Kerry, Cortez, Schummer, Holchul, Newsom, Biden. 
    It matters not the candidate's individual position because they all carry the water for the party. Not so under Conservatism (specifically Conservatives). Conservatism is worse!

No two Conservative Republicans from any level of office, candidacy, delegation can ever agree on any damned thing ever!
 

.... And That Is The Diatribe....





 

In the next segments I will talk in more detail about each of the five points and how they affect the rationale of a Leftist.  As I stated before it is a closed loop system. You will discover at the end how the entire thing is connected.